THE MORALITY OF LUNATICS
(Practice and Policy of American Government)
Humanoid evolution, by the genes of Darwin’s natural selection and by Dawkins memes of the 21st century, still continues along the antiquated and moronic paradigms of statism and theism, notwithstanding model: democracy, autocracy, monarch, Christianity, Islam, Judaism, ad nauseum. The most advanced and backward of them still promote and practice murder, punishment, dogma, and theft as primary means (war, death penalty, taxes, sin, etc.) by which individual human beings can be stopped from killing and stealing. The preeminent methodology for this oxymoronic madness is, of course, war.
The deluded cognition responsible for this phenomenon is the absolute belief that the individual human being is inferior and subservient to the collective “beings”—church and state, or as Aristotle put it, “The state is by nature clearly prior to the individual.” Consequently, the only provable existent in the universe, the individual human being is to be subsumed by the authority of the mythical non-existent collectives—church and state abstractions that in reality do not even exist.
The most obvious indictment that they are non-existents is the infallible fact that they are formed, always by force, of certain omnipresent existents—individual human beings. Therefore, the individual is either an enslaved enforcer for the collective, or an enslaved victim of the collective. Whether by the force and violence of the bullet or the ballot, the individual human being remains slave qua slave!
Read more . . .
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Thursday, August 7, 2008
INTELLECTUAL FELLATIO
INTELLECTUAL FELLATIO
(Serving The State)
To blow and swallow at the same moment is not easy.
Plautus
An article by Christopher Hitchens in Harpers magazine indicts and proves that Henry Kissinger in Vietnam and Chile committed common crimes and war crimes. In these situations the U.S. Government employed Kissinger; hence he acted and spoke for that government. Consequently, and correctly so, Hitchens maintains that Kissinger should be brought to account.
The problem, of course, with Kissinger and his ilk is the unbelievable contradiction that somehow Kissinger’s crimes differ historically from all the identical crimes of Eisenhower against the Germans, General Westmoreland against the Vietnamese, President Truman against Koreans at No Gun Ri, President Jackson against the Indians on the Trail of tears, Janet Reno at WACO, FBI Agent Horiuchi at Ruby Ridge, or the entire U.S. Government and its Mein Kampf Constitution against blacks everywhere!
Media’s “blowing and swallowing” simultaneously begins: Hitchens was speaking of Kissinger as nothing more than a common murderer with Brian Lamb on C-SPAN when the sound quickly and conveniently went off just as Hitchens was describing Kissinger in Hitlerian terms. I watch C-SPAN often, and not even on the major networks, where I’m certain censorship is universal, have I witnessed such cowardly censorship! As Will Durant once remarked, “the Ten Commandments must be silent when national survival is at stake.”
Of course, this is the nature of any collective albeit business, education, labor, media, religion or government. While amoral liars all, it is only government (aka state) that uses force with impunity and immunity to kill and steal (No thou shalt not’s for the state). From time to time one of these media toadies to the state break their bonds. For example, P.J. O’Rourke relates in his excellent book A Parliament of Whores,
It was at this moment in the middle of the Blathering sewer debate that I achieved enlightenment about government—what I hadn’t realized was government is morally wrong.
He still has much to learn, but peace and prosperity would take a quantum leap forward if just 25% of the media experienced such a revelation!
The other collectives—business, education, religion, labor, etc., even wanting to, could not/cannot bring force capable of going eyeball to eyeball with the state. In fact, because of that they are usually bedfellows of government. As Ayn Rand puts it in her brilliant “Sanction of the Victim” speech.
Then I saw what was wrong with the world—I saw that evil was impotent—that the only weapon of its triumph was the willingness of the good to serve it.
Read more . . .
(Serving The State)
To blow and swallow at the same moment is not easy.
Plautus
An article by Christopher Hitchens in Harpers magazine indicts and proves that Henry Kissinger in Vietnam and Chile committed common crimes and war crimes. In these situations the U.S. Government employed Kissinger; hence he acted and spoke for that government. Consequently, and correctly so, Hitchens maintains that Kissinger should be brought to account.
The problem, of course, with Kissinger and his ilk is the unbelievable contradiction that somehow Kissinger’s crimes differ historically from all the identical crimes of Eisenhower against the Germans, General Westmoreland against the Vietnamese, President Truman against Koreans at No Gun Ri, President Jackson against the Indians on the Trail of tears, Janet Reno at WACO, FBI Agent Horiuchi at Ruby Ridge, or the entire U.S. Government and its Mein Kampf Constitution against blacks everywhere!
Media’s “blowing and swallowing” simultaneously begins: Hitchens was speaking of Kissinger as nothing more than a common murderer with Brian Lamb on C-SPAN when the sound quickly and conveniently went off just as Hitchens was describing Kissinger in Hitlerian terms. I watch C-SPAN often, and not even on the major networks, where I’m certain censorship is universal, have I witnessed such cowardly censorship! As Will Durant once remarked, “the Ten Commandments must be silent when national survival is at stake.”
Of course, this is the nature of any collective albeit business, education, labor, media, religion or government. While amoral liars all, it is only government (aka state) that uses force with impunity and immunity to kill and steal (No thou shalt not’s for the state). From time to time one of these media toadies to the state break their bonds. For example, P.J. O’Rourke relates in his excellent book A Parliament of Whores,
It was at this moment in the middle of the Blathering sewer debate that I achieved enlightenment about government—what I hadn’t realized was government is morally wrong.
He still has much to learn, but peace and prosperity would take a quantum leap forward if just 25% of the media experienced such a revelation!
The other collectives—business, education, religion, labor, etc., even wanting to, could not/cannot bring force capable of going eyeball to eyeball with the state. In fact, because of that they are usually bedfellows of government. As Ayn Rand puts it in her brilliant “Sanction of the Victim” speech.
Then I saw what was wrong with the world—I saw that evil was impotent—that the only weapon of its triumph was the willingness of the good to serve it.
Read more . . .
Friday, August 1, 2008
THEFT
THEFT
The point to remember is that what government 'gives’ it must first take away.
John S. Coleman
Are taxes theft? Yes! No!—Well, uh, maybe?—Hell, I don't know take a vote; conduct a poll! I've got such a headache! Words are sooo confusing.
The principal theme of this essay is an examination of and answer to the above etymological, semantical, and epistemological quagmire in which most human beings are bogged. Because of the tribalistic rituals and superstitions, by which 99% of human beings direct their lives, limited language and knowledge forge a visceral moat around the neo-cortex and cerebrum thus obstructing reason and logic from controlling primordial emotions.
Consequently, that language and knowledge used for seeking truth and recognizing reality weaves a motif of collectivist-statist tyranny that rationalizes the morality of theft and plunder, not acceptable for individual human behavior, but mandated for the perpetuation and survival of the state.
The essay's theme indicts then proves that taxes are the identical twin to the thief in the night, and are as a Cato Institute study concluded, "the belly of the beast of government." Coincidentally, those same false conclusions of what defines theft expose the abject failure of even "educated" people (journalist to economics professors) to understand, let alone demonstrate, consistent language usage, logical thinking, and non-contradictory prose.
I shall not commit such errors; therefore, to accomplish this task, it is essential that I offer a consistent, logical, non-contradictory synopsis of the philosophical axioms and principles grounding the essay's hypothesis: TAXES ARE THEFT.
1. The primacy of the individual human being. (It is self-evident.)
2. The axiom of birthrights: The self-evident absolutes per the biological fact of being born.
3. The fundamental rights subsumed under the axiom birthrights are life, liberty, property, trade, speech and bodily sovereignty.
4. Any act of force against the individual human being or his/her axiomatic birthrights is the axiomatic definition of evil.
Again, as simple with sense as I can get, reality with only one exception (the wave/particle “contradiction” of light at the sub-microscopic level of quantum physics) never allows for something to be and not to be at the same moment in time/space. An absolutely clear understanding of nature’s laws, birthrights and reality-based language is mandated for anyone to grasp the truth of this essay.
Unlike the “whim-worshipers," as Ayn Rand labeled them ("Automatic omniscience is what a whim-worshipper ascribes to his/her emotions.") those indicted in the essay as promoters and supporters of theft, I do not think or write from a Janus-faced/weathervane system of reality, ethics-justice, etc. Therefore, again not like such statists, good and evil, right and wrong are never subject to change by a vote, poll, legislation by clerk's for tyranny in Washington DC, revolving door interpretation of the constitution, or the intellectual wasteland of some columnist's mind.
Now to some final words of that précis of the book I'm writing pertinent to this essay:
In their simplest form, without loopholes, they are the Judaic-Christian Commandments: Thou shalt not kill and thou shalt not steal.
For the more earthly bound with half a mind, all precepts, referents, concretes, symbols, etc., homogenously bastardized to conceptualize “living,” “thinking,” “existence,” “rights,” “powers,” etc., to collectives such as state, government, public, nation, community, neighborhood, ad nauseam are self-evidently false and metaphysically impossible! The primacy of the individual human being proves that!
But, say their creators, pointing to vacuous constructs, “They do exist!” Absolutely not, I again prove; they are enforced! What exists, I irrefutably prove is the individual human being and the inorganic object the gun! Then, like any organized individual bandits it’s, “Your money or your life!”—albeit gangs of “crips,” “bloods,” “hell’s angels,” on the street, or the alphabet soup plunderers from Washington: IRS, DEA, RICO, FBI, et al.!
Since all birthrights are subsumed under the primacy of the individual human being, it is the primacy of evil for any form of government to lay claim to the power to grant or deny such rights. It is a self-evident abomination since to do so governments must use force.
All transactions, affiliations, bondings, etc., between or among individual human beings, without exception, can only be by the voluntary consent of each and every individual so involved.
All such bindings are consummated by signed contract, oath or vow of each and every individual human being to be so bound. All terms and conditions of the binding must be implicitly and explicitly stated and understood.
Along with the axiom, my body belongs to only me, should stand before the dawn of time with no dead people binding anyone!!
Note: Many people, usually the so-called highly educated, belittle me for my frequent use of capital letters, underlining, exclamation points, etc. Of course, I know the origins of such elitist bias. I sat through the same classes of pedantic prudery.
READ MORE . . .
The point to remember is that what government 'gives’ it must first take away.
John S. Coleman
Are taxes theft? Yes! No!—Well, uh, maybe?—Hell, I don't know take a vote; conduct a poll! I've got such a headache! Words are sooo confusing.
The principal theme of this essay is an examination of and answer to the above etymological, semantical, and epistemological quagmire in which most human beings are bogged. Because of the tribalistic rituals and superstitions, by which 99% of human beings direct their lives, limited language and knowledge forge a visceral moat around the neo-cortex and cerebrum thus obstructing reason and logic from controlling primordial emotions.
Consequently, that language and knowledge used for seeking truth and recognizing reality weaves a motif of collectivist-statist tyranny that rationalizes the morality of theft and plunder, not acceptable for individual human behavior, but mandated for the perpetuation and survival of the state.
The essay's theme indicts then proves that taxes are the identical twin to the thief in the night, and are as a Cato Institute study concluded, "the belly of the beast of government." Coincidentally, those same false conclusions of what defines theft expose the abject failure of even "educated" people (journalist to economics professors) to understand, let alone demonstrate, consistent language usage, logical thinking, and non-contradictory prose.
I shall not commit such errors; therefore, to accomplish this task, it is essential that I offer a consistent, logical, non-contradictory synopsis of the philosophical axioms and principles grounding the essay's hypothesis: TAXES ARE THEFT.
1. The primacy of the individual human being. (It is self-evident.)
2. The axiom of birthrights: The self-evident absolutes per the biological fact of being born.
3. The fundamental rights subsumed under the axiom birthrights are life, liberty, property, trade, speech and bodily sovereignty.
4. Any act of force against the individual human being or his/her axiomatic birthrights is the axiomatic definition of evil.
Again, as simple with sense as I can get, reality with only one exception (the wave/particle “contradiction” of light at the sub-microscopic level of quantum physics) never allows for something to be and not to be at the same moment in time/space. An absolutely clear understanding of nature’s laws, birthrights and reality-based language is mandated for anyone to grasp the truth of this essay.
Unlike the “whim-worshipers," as Ayn Rand labeled them ("Automatic omniscience is what a whim-worshipper ascribes to his/her emotions.") those indicted in the essay as promoters and supporters of theft, I do not think or write from a Janus-faced/weathervane system of reality, ethics-justice, etc. Therefore, again not like such statists, good and evil, right and wrong are never subject to change by a vote, poll, legislation by clerk's for tyranny in Washington DC, revolving door interpretation of the constitution, or the intellectual wasteland of some columnist's mind.
Now to some final words of that précis of the book I'm writing pertinent to this essay:
In their simplest form, without loopholes, they are the Judaic-Christian Commandments: Thou shalt not kill and thou shalt not steal.
For the more earthly bound with half a mind, all precepts, referents, concretes, symbols, etc., homogenously bastardized to conceptualize “living,” “thinking,” “existence,” “rights,” “powers,” etc., to collectives such as state, government, public, nation, community, neighborhood, ad nauseam are self-evidently false and metaphysically impossible! The primacy of the individual human being proves that!
But, say their creators, pointing to vacuous constructs, “They do exist!” Absolutely not, I again prove; they are enforced! What exists, I irrefutably prove is the individual human being and the inorganic object the gun! Then, like any organized individual bandits it’s, “Your money or your life!”—albeit gangs of “crips,” “bloods,” “hell’s angels,” on the street, or the alphabet soup plunderers from Washington: IRS, DEA, RICO, FBI, et al.!
Since all birthrights are subsumed under the primacy of the individual human being, it is the primacy of evil for any form of government to lay claim to the power to grant or deny such rights. It is a self-evident abomination since to do so governments must use force.
All transactions, affiliations, bondings, etc., between or among individual human beings, without exception, can only be by the voluntary consent of each and every individual so involved.
All such bindings are consummated by signed contract, oath or vow of each and every individual human being to be so bound. All terms and conditions of the binding must be implicitly and explicitly stated and understood.
Along with the axiom, my body belongs to only me, should stand before the dawn of time with no dead people binding anyone!!
Note: Many people, usually the so-called highly educated, belittle me for my frequent use of capital letters, underlining, exclamation points, etc. Of course, I know the origins of such elitist bias. I sat through the same classes of pedantic prudery.
READ MORE . . .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)